Infrared observations of IGR J17497-2821: 3 candidate counterparts
ATel #897; S. Chaty (AIM CEA Saclay/University Paris 7, France), Y. Matsuoka (Inst. Astronomy, Univ. Tokyo, Japan), T. Nagata and Y. Ueda (Dept. Astronomy, Kyoto Univ., Japan)
on 25 Sep 2006; 21:19 UT
Credential Certification: Sylvain Chaty (S.Chaty@open.ac.uk)
Subjects: Infra-Red, X-ray, Request for Observations, Binary, Black Hole
We have obtained infrared (IR) observations in J, H and Ks bands of the
field of IGR J17497-2821 (atel #885) at 1.4m IRSF at South African
Astronomical Observatory on 3 consecutive nights, respectively
starting at 2006-09-22 (UTC 17:47, 18:39 and 20:17), 2006-09-23 (UTC
18:49) and 2006-09-24 (UTC 17:33). The 3-band images were obtained
simultaneously with the IR camera SIRIUS, from 5s x 10 dither
integrations. The pixel scale is 0.45", giving a field of view of 7.7arcmin
x 7.7arcmin. We used standard method to reduce images,
including removal of dark, flat-field and median IR sky.
We first point out that there has been some confusion about the Swift
coordinates: Walter et al. 2006 (atel #889) give a SWIFT XRT refined
position of RA=17:49:37 DEC=-28:21:28 (J2000), with an error of 5".
However they look for possible candidate counterparts in the
2MASS catalogue near RA=17:49:37 DEC=-28:21:18 (J2000). Then,
Laycock et al. 2006 (atel #895) look for optical counterparts around
the position RA=17:49:37.8 DEC=-28:21:18 (J2000), which is indeed
the right SWIFT position (J. Zurita, priv. comm.).
Furthermore, by inspecting 2MASS images, we see that the two 2MASS sources
which are in the Swift 5" error circle (2MASS 17493780-2821181 and
2MASS 17493774-2821173, see atels #889 and #895) are blended in the
2MASS image. The given magnitudes of both objects in the 2MASS
catalogue are therefore probably contaminated by the other source. For
instance, 2MASS 17493780-2821181 is much redder and its J magnitude in
2MASS PSC seems to be affected by the other source. The closest to
the swift position is 2MASS 17493780-2821181, at only 0.167"; 2MASS
17493774-2821173 is located at 0.989" of the Swift position.
We thereafter inspected our new IRSF/SIRIUS images and compared
them with 2MASS images. 2MASS 17493780-2821181 itself appears to be
also a blended object in the IRSF K image, and the object located at
the East of this blended object is more reddened. We derived the
position of this object (called candidate 3 in the following), thanks
to 2MASS stars of the field of view: galactic coordinates (l,b) ~
(267.4077, -28.3550). Finally, we computed the magnitudes of the 3
candidate counterparts, using stars of the 2MASS catalogue, present in
the field of view. We give the results of this photometry in the
Table below, but we point out that the magnitudes of candidate 3 are
preliminary because they might be contaminated by 2MASS
17493780-2821181.
%%%
2006-09-22
Object J err H err K err
2MASS 17493780-2821181: x x 13.2 0.3 12.5 0.2
2MASS 17493774-2821173: 14.0 0.3 13.5 0.2 13.0 0.2
candidate 3: >18.8 0.5 13.4 0.4 12.9 0.2
2006-09-23
Object J err H err K err
2MASS 17493780-2821181: x x 13.3 0.2 12.5 0.2
2MASS 17493774-2821173: 14.3 0.1 13.4 0.2 13.0 0.3
candidate 3: >18.7 0.5 x x 12.5 0.2
2006-09-24
Object J err H err K err
2MASS 17493780-2821181: 14.1 0.1 13.3 0.1 12.5 0.2
2MASS 17493774-2821173: 14.1 0.1 13.3 0.1 12.8 0.2
candidate 3: >18.6 0.5 13.2 0.1 12.5 0.2
(The "x" indicate a source too blended to be separated).
%%%
These observations suggest that candidate 3 is the real counterpart
of the source, because of the variation of the source, and its
reddening, which would be consistent with the position of IGR
J17497-2821 in the galactic bulge, as suggested from the high value of
its column density (Kuulkers et al. atel #888). Further high
resolution IR observations are encouraged, in order to look for
variations of these 3 candidate counterparts, and confirm (or not)
candidate 3 as the counterpart of IGR J17497-2821.