INTEGRAL and Swift follow-up observations of XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217
ATel #2807; L. Pavan (ISDC-University of Geneva), R. Terrier (CNRS/APC France), E. Bozzo, C. Ferrigno (ISDC-University of Geneva), S. Mereghetti, A. Paizis, L. Ducci (INAF-IASF Milano), D. Gotz (CEA Saclay), A. Bazzano, M. Fiocchi, A. De Rosa, A. Tarana, M. Del Santo, L. Natalucci, F. Panessa, F. Capitanio (INAF-IASF, Rome), V. Sguera, V. Bianchin (INAF-IASF, Bologna), K. Watanabe (FGCU), L. Kuiper (SRON), L. Barragan (FAU), J. Chenevez (DTU), I. Caballero (CEA Saclay), C. Shrader (GSFC/USRA), A. Bird (Southampton), G. Puehlhofer (IAA Tuebingen), C. Sanchez-Fernandez (ESAC), G. Skinner (CRESST/GSFC/UMCP), P. R. den Hartog (HEPL/KIPAC), K. Pottschmidt (UMBC/NASA GSFC), I. Negueruela (Alicante), L. Prat (CEA Saclay)
on 23 Aug 2010; 17:21 UT
Distributed as an Instant Email Notice Transients
Credential Certification: Nami Mowlavi (Nami.Mowlavi@obs.unige.ch)
Subjects: X-ray, Gamma Ray, Binary, Black Hole, Neutron Star
Following the detection of hard X-ray emission from XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217 (Atel #2607)
with INTEGRAL (Atel #2803), a Swift/XRT follow-up observation (2 ks) was performed
on 2010 August 20 from 13:03 to 14:53, simultaneously with the newly INTEGRAL
observation of the same FOV (2010 August 19 at 17:13 to 2010 August 20
at 15:08, PI R. Terrier).
In the Swift/XRT FOV only one X-ray source is detected
at a position consistent with that of XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217.
The source spectrum was best fit (chi^2_red/dof=0.97/27)
by using an absorbed power-law model with N_h=(5.1-1.2+1.4)E22 cm^(-2)
and Gamma=2.1+/-0.5. The estimated 2-10 keV flux is 2.6E-11 erg/cm^2/s
(2-10 keV).
XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217 was not detected in the simultaneous
INTEGRAL observations. We estimated a 3 sigma upper limit
on its X-ray flux of 11 mCrab (~2.6E-10 erg/cm^2/s) in the
3-20 keV energy band (Jem-X, exposure time 5.5 ks),
3.5 mCrab (~2.7E-11 erg/cm^2/s) in the 20-40 keV energy band, and
5.5 mCrab (~3.9E-11 erg/cm^2/s) in the 40-80 keV energy band
(ISGRI, exposure time 75 ks).
These results suggest that XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217 might have
undergone a re-brightening after its previous return to quiescence
(Atel #2738) and is now fading again (the highest flux measured
by Swift/XRT from this source was of ~5E-11 erg/cm^2/s, i.e. a
factor of ~2 larger than the current value).
We performed a fit of the combined Swift/XRT and ISGRI spectrum
(we used the spectrum discussed in Atel #2803) with an absorbed power-law
model and included a constant to account
for variability and inter-calibration between the two instruments.
We obtained spectral parameter completely compatible with
those reported above and a value of the inter-calibration
constant of 2.2-1.3+3.3. This
suggests that the variation of the source X-ray
flux between the two observations was not dramatic.
We thanks the Swift team for their support and rapid scheduling of the
observation of XMMSL1 J171900.4-353217.