Support ATel At Patreon

[ Previous | Next | ADS ]

Swift observations of the super-soft emission during the 2024 eruption of Nova LMC 1968

ATel #16772; K. L. Page (U. Leicester), N. P.M. Kuin (UCL/MSSL) and M. J. Darnley (LJMU)
on 14 Aug 2024; 16:05 UT
Credential Certification: Kim Page (kpa@star.le.ac.uk)

Subjects: Ultra-Violet, X-ray, Nova

As noted in ATel #16752, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory observed the Large Magellanic Cloud Recurrent Nova LMC 1968 (LMC V1341) within a few hours of its most recent eruption on 2024 August 1. Monthly monitoring observations of the nova by Swift have been performed since the end of the 2020 eruption, and we were lucky that the August observation occurred on the day the latest eruption began!

Following that discovery, daily observations have been (and are continuing to be) taken since August 6, with the XRT data collected on August 8 (7.8 days post-eruption; 1.2 ks of exposure time) revealing an obvious soft X-ray component, at a 0.3-10 keV count rate of 0.052 ± 0.007 count s-1. The vast majority of the detected counts are below 1 keV. Approximating the spectrum with an absorbed BB, we measure kT = 71 +28/-50 eV and NH < 7 x 1021 cm-2. A longer observation the following day (August 9; 2.3 ks), at a count rate of 0.096 ± 0.007 count s-1, provided better constrained spectral parameters, with kT = 66 ± 12 eV and NH = (1.5 +1.3/-0.8) x 1021 cm-2; this absorbing column is consistent with the value found by Kuin et al. (2020, MNRAS, 491, 655), after an initial clearing of the ejecta following the 2016 eruption of this nova.

Multi-band photometry is being collected by UVOT. Following the initial magnitudes reported in ATel #16752, the source faded by three magnitudes by the following observation on August 6 (uvm2 = 13.05 ± 0.03 and uvw1 = 13.14 ± 0.03), allowing for standard photometry to be used. After further fading, the UV and optical magnitudes have plateaued since August 8, as is often seen during the supersoft X-ray phase of recurrent novae (e.g. Hachisu et al. 2008, ASP Conf. Ser. 261, 629; Schaefer 2010, ApJS, 187, 275), around uvm2 = 15.11 ± 0.04 and uvw1 = 15.23 ± 0.03.

Swift observations are ongoing, and we thank the Swift PI, Brad Cenko, and his deputies for approving the monitoring, as well as the Swift planning and operations teams for their continuing support.